Congress questions ECI's unanimous decision claim in electoral roll row

The Congress party has disputed the Election Commission of India's contention before the Supreme Court regarding the decision-making process on special summary revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, raising questions about whether consensus among commissioners ensures adherence to established protocols.

The ECI submitted an affidavit to the apex court stating that all determinations relating to the SIR were adopted unanimously by its three-member panel, attempting to bolster the legitimacy of the electoral process. However, a senior Congress leader countered that unanimity in voting does not necessarily validate whether proper procedures and rules were followed during the decision-making process.

The exchange comes amid broader scrutiny of the Chief Election Commissioner's role and the commission's administrative practices. The Congress leader's intervention suggests the opposition party is questioning not just the outcomes of electoral decisions, but the methodology and regulatory compliance underlying them.

The matter has now become part of the judicial discourse on electoral governance, with the Supreme Court examining the ECI's decision-making framework during the SIR process. The dispute highlights ongoing tensions between political parties and the election administration over procedural transparency and adherence to constitutional norms in managing India's electoral machinery.