Drilon calls on Congress to clarify Supreme Court's unprogrammed funds ruling

MANILA — Former Senate President Franklin Drilon on Thursday called on Congress to seek immediate clarification from the Supreme Court regarding its recent ruling on unprogrammed appropriations, warning that certain conditions prescribed by the high court could encroach on the legislature's constitutional powers over the national budget.

The Supreme Court's decision, which struck down key provisions of the 2024, 2025, and 2026 national budgets as unconstitutional, included specific conditions governing how unprogrammed funds may be released and utilized. Drilon expressed concern that these conditions require closer examination to determine whether they overstep the Court's authority and undermine Congress's budgeting prerogatives.

Unprogrammed appropriations are funds allocated in the budget but not immediately released, typically held in reserve for contingencies or opportunities that arise during the fiscal year. The executive branch traditionally seeks legislative approval before tapping these reserves, a process that has become increasingly contentious in recent budget cycles.

Drilon's appeal underscores broader tensions between the judiciary and legislature over budgetary control, particularly as the country grapples with fiscal constraints and competing demands for government spending. Congressional leaders are expected to convene to discuss potential responses to the Supreme Court's decision and its implications for future budget cycles.

The clarification sought by Drilon could prove critical for establishing clearer guidelines on unprogrammed fund releases, potentially preventing future constitutional conflicts and providing greater certainty to budget planning efforts across government agencies.