Duterte has constitutional right to silence in impeachment trial, counsel argues

Defense counsel Sheila Sison presented arguments before the impeachment court, citing constitutional provisions that guarantee the right against self-incrimination. Sison contended that Duterte possesses an "absolute" right to remain silent and cannot be forced to provide testimony that would incriminate her in the case.

The assertion came during the impeachment trial, which has drawn significant public attention as it involves the country's second-highest elected official. The constitutional right against compulsory self-incrimination is recognized under Philippine law and has been a central element of defense strategies in high-profile cases.

Duterte faces impeachment charges that have prompted extensive proceedings before the Senate-based tribunal. Her legal team's invocation of constitutional protections represents a standard defense mechanism available to all individuals under the Philippine legal system, though the application in an impeachment trial—a political rather than criminal proceeding—raises distinct legal considerations.

The trial has continued with arguments from both the prosecution and defense teams as senators weigh the evidence and legal positions presented. The impeachment process remains ongoing with further hearings scheduled to address the charges brought against the Vice President.