ECI Asserts All SIR Orders Were Unanimous Decisions by Commission

The Election Commission of India filed its response before the Supreme Court on Wednesday, categorically stating that each of the three SIR orders under scrutiny were adopted through unanimous decisions of the full commission rather than through individual action by the Chief Election Commissioner.

The submission represents the ECI's formal position on the contentious issue, which has been the subject of judicial examination. The commission's statement directly addresses concerns raised regarding the decision-making process and the extent of individual versus collective authority in issuing the orders.

The case remains pending before the Supreme Court, with the full bench expected to consider the ECI's submissions alongside arguments from other parties. The matter has attracted significant attention given its implications for the functioning of India's electoral machinery and the constitutional framework governing the Election Commission's operations.

The unanimous nature of the commission's decisions, according to the ECI's filing, underscores that the orders reflected the institutional consensus of all commissioners rather than unilateral action by any single official. This assertion is likely to feature prominently in the court's eventual determination of whether the procedures followed were constitutionally sound and aligned with established electoral practices.