Experts call for depoliticizing Teesta river project amid regional tensions

The Teesta river, a critical water source for millions across the region, has long been entangled with bilateral tensions between Bangladesh and India, complicating efforts to develop joint management frameworks. Experts argue that treating the transboundary river solely through a political lens undermines the technical and humanitarian imperatives that should govern water-sharing agreements and development projects.

Water resource managers contend that the Teesta project's success depends on separating it from broader geopolitical considerations that have historically stalled progress on the river. Both nations stand to benefit from coordinated infrastructure development, improved irrigation systems, and flood management mechanisms that would serve populations on both sides of the border.

The challenge lies in establishing institutional mechanisms that can withstand diplomatic fluctuations. Regional observers suggest that independent technical committees, third-party oversight, and clearly defined protocols could help depoliticize negotiations and implementation of the Teesta project, allowing progress to continue regardless of shifting bilateral relations.

Stakeholders emphasize that delaying or weaponizing water resources threatens food security and livelihoods across South Asia. Creating buffers between project management and political decision-making may prove essential for achieving sustainable outcomes on the Teesta and setting precedents for other shared water resources in the region.