Former Chief Justice warns proposed anti-terrorism bill could target political opponents

Former Chief Justice Sarath Nanda Silva has cautioned that the proposed Protection of State from Terrorism Bill poses risks to fundamental freedoms and could be weaponized against those who oppose government policies. Speaking on the matter, the retired jurist warned that the legislation could enable authorities to brand political opponents and critics as terrorists without adequate safeguards.

The ex-Chief Justice's concerns align with reservations previously expressed by former Foreign Minister Prof. G. L. Peiris, who contended that the proposed law would conflict with Sri Lanka's constitutional framework and international human rights obligations. Both senior statesmen have highlighted the absence of sufficient checks and balances in the bill's current formulation.

The Protection of State from Terrorism Bill remains a subject of significant public and legal discourse in Sri Lanka, with civil society groups, legal professionals, and political figures debating its scope and potential implications for citizens' rights. Critics have emphasized the necessity for robust judicial oversight and clearly defined parameters to prevent misuse of anti-terrorism legislation.

The government has not yet responded to the former Chief Justice's statement regarding the proposed legislation.