Business · World News Bureau
No, Pakistan's Tarbela Dam has not broken
Social media posts claimed Tarbela Dam had broken after a rock collapse flooded a tunnel at its T-5 hydropower project on 9 November. Officials say the main dam is safe, and a viral 'poor construction' video was online months earlier. The real story is the project's delays and costs.
LSN World News ·

<p><em>Special Reporting from LSN News, adapted from today's Asia Behind the Headlines episode. <a href="https://youtu.be/0gdG5bzNHnE" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Watch the video on YouTube.</a></em></p>
<p>"If the dam had broken, it would have caused flooding downstream." That was Haripur Deputy Commissioner Waseem Ahmed on Monday, 9 November, rejecting social media claims that Pakistan's Tarbela Dam had broken. It had not. What did happen at the dam's fifth extension hydropower project, known as T-5, was serious enough, and the rumours have crowded out the questions that matter.</p>
<h2>What actually happened at T-5</h2>
<p>On 9 November, during excavation of the second bench connecting tunnel at the Tarbela 5th Extension Hydropower Project, a weak rock mass collapsed. Water from the project's intake pit entered the tunnel and the under-construction powerhouse area. The Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) says all workers were immediately evacuated safely, with no injury or loss of life reported. The Express Tribune reports that one worker was swept into the water as the tunnel flooded and was rescued.</p>
<p>WAPDA moved quickly to counter the online reports. In a post on X on 9 November it said there was no damage to the main tunnel, the powerhouse, the tailrace or the switchyard, and that "reports of tunnel collapse are incorrect." A day later, after its chairman visited the site, the authority said consultants, the contractor and its own project teams agreed there was no threat to the integrity of the main Tarbela Dam or any of its critical structures. The chairman ordered a departmental inquiry into the incident.</p>
<h2>The recycled video</h2>
<p>As the incident spread online, so did supposed evidence of what caused it. Soch Fact Check, a Pakistani fact-checking organisation, examined a Facebook video showing a man kicking a concrete structure until pieces broke away. It was shared as proof of poor construction at Tarbela, with a caption claiming the dam's protective structure "breaks with a kick", resulting in that day's incident.</p>
<p>The same footage had been posted on Facebook on 3 August 2026, more than three months before the T-5 incident. That earlier post described it as a roadside safety wall in Kohistan, in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and made no mention of Tarbela. Soch could not independently verify where the clip was filmed, but its earlier appearance means it cannot show damage from the November incident or explain its cause.</p>
<h2>The story the rumours bury</h2>
<p>The T-5 project matters well beyond Haripur. It is designed to add 1,530 megawatts of generating capacity to Tarbela through three units of 510 megawatts each, raising the dam's total installed capacity from 4,888 megawatts to 6,418 megawatts. It is backed by 390 million US dollars from the World Bank and 300 million US dollars from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and the civil works contract went to China's Power Construction Corporation in May 2021.</p>
<p>It also has a troubled history. Dawn reports that an earlier cofferdam collapse at the project contributed to at least a two-year delay, and that the project's cost has risen from 82 billion rupees to 317 billion rupees. In July, a government-constituted inquiry committee held the contractor, the consultant and WAPDA all responsible for that collapse. After this week's incident, WAPDA's chairman directed the project teams to carry out remedial measures and finalise a contingency plan to minimise delays to completion.</p>
<p><strong>Our read:</strong> The dam did not break, but a project already years late and nearly four times its original cost has just been set back again. Fake clips turn a real accountability question into a shouting match about a disaster that never happened. The inquiry WAPDA has ordered is where the real answers should come from. Ask about the overruns, not the rumour.</p>
<h2>Sources</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.arabnews.pk/pakistan/pakistan-says-no-threat-to-tarbela-dams-integrity-after-rock-mass-collapse-3006675" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Arab News, 10 Nov</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.dawn.com/news/2043275" target="_blank" rel="noopener">WAPDA via Dawn, 9 Nov</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.brecorder.com/news/40448366" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Business Recorder, 11 Nov</a></li>
<li><a href="https://tribune.com.pk/story/2639423/tarbela-t-5-project-work-suspended-indefinitely-after-protective-bund-breach" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Express Tribune, 9 Nov</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.sochfactcheck.com/video-of-man-breaking-concrete-falsely-linked-to-tarbela-dam-incident/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Soch Fact Check, 12 Nov</a></li>
</ul>