PAS accuses DAP of selective outrage over Zahid legal case

At the PAS annual assembly, Mardhiyyah highlighted what she characterised as inconsistency in DAP's stance on judicial matters, claiming the party had remained silent on similar issues when they aligned with political interests.

The Kedah delegate's remarks underscored the broader tensions between the two opposition blocs, with PAS framing its coalition partner's criticism as opportunistic rather than principled. She asserted that PAS maintains consistent respect for the rule of law regardless of which individuals or parties are involved in legal proceedings.

The comments reflect ongoing debates within Malaysia's political landscape regarding how different parties approach legal cases involving prominent political figures. PAS has increasingly positioned itself as committed to institutional frameworks and judicial processes, contrasting this with what it perceives as selective activism by rivals.

The exchange highlights the fractured nature of opposition politics in Malaysia, where former coalition partners continue to trade accusations of hypocrisy and inconsistency. Such disputes underscore the challenges facing the opposition in presenting a unified front ahead of future electoral contests.