Politics · Sri Lanka Bureau
Proposed Anti-Terror Bill 'more dangerous than PTA', court told
Legal counsel has argued before Sri Lanka's Supreme Court that a proposed anti-terrorism bill poses greater risks than the existing Prevention of Terrorism Act. The submissions were made during proceedings examining the constitutional implications of the new legislation.
LSN Sri Lanka ·
A counsel appearing before the Supreme Court has contended that a newly proposed anti-terrorism bill contains provisions more problematic than those found in the current Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), raising fresh concerns about the measure's compatibility with constitutional safeguards.
The argument was presented during Supreme Court proceedings examining the proposed legislation's adherence to constitutional protections and fundamental rights. The counsel's position suggests that rather than addressing existing concerns with the PTA, the new bill may introduce additional restrictions on civil liberties and due process protections.
The contentions come as Sri Lanka continues to grapple with balancing national security imperatives against constitutional protections for citizens. The debate reflects ongoing concerns among legal experts and rights advocates regarding terrorism-related legislation and its potential impact on fundamental freedoms.
The Supreme Court proceedings provide a forum for examining whether the proposed bill meets constitutional requirements before its potential enactment. The case adds to the broader discussion within Sri Lanka's legal community about the appropriate scope and safeguards necessary in counter-terrorism legislation.