Revised cyber law may retain restrictions on free expression, experts warn

Proposed revisions to Bangladesh's cyber law remain vulnerable to misuse as an instrument for silencing political opposition and critical voices, according to legal experts reviewing the draft amendments. The concerns echo long-standing criticism that existing provisions have been weaponized against journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens expressing views deemed unfavorable to authorities.

The draft modifications, which have been circulated among stakeholders, appear to maintain broad language that could be interpreted to criminalize legitimate speech and online expression. Analysts point to vaguely worded clauses dealing with false information, public order disruption, and national security as particularly problematic, arguing they lack sufficient safeguards to distinguish between genuine threats and protected speech.

Civil society organizations have called for more substantial reforms that would align the cyber law with international standards for freedom of expression and due process protections. They have urged lawmakers to include clearer definitions of offenses, higher thresholds for prosecution, and judicial oversight mechanisms to prevent arbitrary enforcement.

The government had previously indicated its willingness to review the controversial legislation following domestic and international pressure. However, rights groups contend that the current draft revision does not adequately address their core concerns about protecting fundamental freedoms while maintaining legitimate law enforcement capabilities.