Rights group decries defense warnings in Duterte impeachment case

CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY — Human rights advocate Carlos Conde has criticized the defense panel in Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial, characterizing warnings of potential criminal liability against witnesses and observers as an "absurd, desperate move" that threatens press freedom.

Conde, a former senior researcher with Human Rights Watch's Asia Division, voiced his concerns during the trial proceedings on Tuesday. He argued that the defense team's statements constituted an assault on fundamental democratic principles and the right of media and civil society to scrutinize the proceedings.

The impeachment trial of Duterte has drawn intense public interest and media coverage since its initiation. The defense warnings have sparked broader debate about the scope of permissible commentary and reporting on the case, with advocates expressing concern that such cautionary statements could have a chilling effect on press coverage and public discourse.

Conde's remarks reflect growing apprehension among human rights organizations regarding procedural fairness and transparency in the trial. The incident highlights the tension between legal safeguards and open discussion as the case progresses through the courts.

The trial continues amid heightened scrutiny from both international and domestic observers monitoring the conduct of judicial proceedings in the Philippines.