Supreme Court acquits official in graft case, faults CBI investigation

In a significant ruling on corruption jurisprudence, the Supreme Court on Wednesday acquitted a government official charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, finding the investigative agency's approach had been hasty and procedurally flawed.

The bench criticised the Central Bureau of Investigation for its impatient handling of the case, noting that the probe had not been conducted with sufficient rigour and methodological care. The court observed that the investigative shortcomings had undermined the prosecution's case against the accused.

The judgment reinforces established legal principles governing offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The bench underscored that the law does not criminalise mere movement of money between parties, but requires proof of corrupt intent and abuse of official position. Financial transactions, standing alone, cannot form the basis for conviction under anti-corruption statutes.

The ruling comes amid ongoing scrutiny of how investigating agencies handle complex corruption cases. Legal experts say the judgment provides important clarity on the evidentiary standards required to prosecute public servants, emphasising that robust investigation underpinned by sound legal reasoning is essential before criminal charges are brought.