Supreme Court hears constitutional challenges to anti-terrorism bill

The Supreme Court commenced proceedings on the controversial bill before a Trial-at-Bar bench led by Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena and senior justices. The hearing represents a significant constitutional test for the government's counter-terrorism legislation, which has drawn widespread scrutiny from civil society organisations and legal experts.

The petitions argue various grounds against the bill's constitutionality, with stakeholders expressing concerns over potential implications for fundamental rights and civil liberties. The volume of challenges filed—22 petitions to date—underscores the level of public and legal concern surrounding the proposed measure.

The Protection of the State from Terrorism Bill was tabled in Parliament as part of the government's security framework. However, critics have raised questions about specific provisions and their alignment with constitutional protections afforded to citizens.

The Supreme Court's examination of these petitions will determine whether the bill, in its current form or as amended, can proceed through Parliament or if significant modifications are necessary. Legal observers are closely monitoring the proceedings, as the court's decision could set important precedents regarding the balance between national security measures and constitutional safeguards in Sri Lanka.